Penawar Kanser Biji Aprikot
BUAH APRICOT,BIJI DI DALAMNYA DI KELUARKAN DAN MENJADI PENAWAR KEPADA BERBAGAI PENYAKIT TERMASUK PENYAKIT MAUT IAITU KANSER
biji apricot yang sudah dipanggang dan boleh terus dimakan mentah
Biji Aprikot Vitamin B17 dapat merawat kanser dan
DALAM VERSI ASAL UNTUK KEKALKAN KETULENANNYA
Read this….It could save your life!!
Vitamin B17 is the alternative cancer solution!
Vitamin B17 also know Amygdalin or Laetrile, is found in Raw Apricot seeds and many other raw Fruit seeds and, is know to cure cancer!
Vitamin B17 is a big part of Real Natural Alternative Way to Cure or Prevent Cancer!
Vitamin B17 was the subject of great controversy over 35 years ago when some of the world’s top scientists claimed that when consumed, the components of the seed make it 100% impossible to develop cancer and will kill existing cancer in most cases.
The pharmaceutical companies pounced on this claim about Vitamin B17 immediately and demanded that the FDA conduct studies about Vitamin B17. The results of these Vitamin B17 studies are found in the book called World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 by G. Edward Griffin or you may be able to get a copy from the library.
The apricot seed was claimed as the cure for all cancers over 35 years ago becuase of the Vitamin B17 which is also known as Laetrile and Amygdalin and is found in most fruit seeds: primarily apricot seeds.
It was even more strongly claimed that when one eats about 7 apricot seeds per day they can never develop cancer…Just as one can never get scurvy if they eat an orange every day, or pellagra if they have some B vitamins every day.
An Important Fact To Remember:
The pharmaceuticals companies together with the medical establishment pushed the FDA into making it illegal to sell “raw” apricot seeds or the B17 vitamin with information about its effects on cancer. Even to this day, you can’t get raw apricot seeds in your health food store, only the sun dried seeds which have all the important enzymes killed off. Pharmaceutical companies only conduct studies on patented chemicals they invent so that at the end of their study, if the drug gets approved, they have sole rights on its sale.(They make back tons more than the mere 250 million that they invested) They never do studies on foods that can’t be patented and that can be sold by any supermarket.
The answer to cancer has been known for many years! The information that you’re about to read regarding the B17 vitamin will guide you in how you can guarantee a nearly cancer free life or help your body get rid of cancer if you have it
Note: This is just a quick version of the facts found at this web site and in the book “World Without Cancer” by G. Edward Griffin. The book ‘World Without Cancer” covers a lot of information on studies that were covered up and great scientists who were arrested when they began telling others about the truth of B17 vitamin. Highly annotated for the serious student who wants to research the information for himself.
This book contains studies on Amygdalin (B17 vitamin , laetrile) that were conducted at the famous cancer institute, Sloan Kettering and covered up. Full explanation of the politics of cancer from Mr. Edward Griffin.
Go through the pages to learn from educated scientists and doctors.
B-17 vitamin is found in most fruit seeds. Its components make it vital for our survival without cancer. Seeds are for everyone to eat. Don’t wait and see if you develop cancer to start eating the seeds. Vitamin B17 is found in seeds such as the apple, peach, cherry, grapes, and apricot. It is found in some beans and many grasses such as wheat grass. The hard wooden pit in the middle of the apricot or peach for example, is not supposed to be thrown away. In fact, the wooden shell is actually a strong armor protecting one of the most important foods known to man, the seed.
It is one of the main courses of food in cultures such as the Navajo Indians, the Hunzakuts, the Abkhazians and many more. Cultures such as these have never had a reported case of cancer when eating their traditional foods!
We don’t need to make the B17 vitamin seed a main course in our diets, but we do need the equivalent of about seven apricots seeds per day. This will nearly guarantee a cancer free life.
Other foods that contain B17 vitamin are:
The bitter almond tree has also been banned from the U.S. years ago.
Apricot seeds have the highest content of the B17 vitamin on earth. They are chewable, bitter and a necessity in our diet. Although apricot seeds are bitter, they must be integrated into our diets. They may be added to food or chopped up and swallowed with a teaspoon of honey or applesauce.The seeds may be used in combination with the Laetrile Cancer Therapy.
As a preventative, Dr. Krebs (the scientist who discovered the B17 vitamin) asserts that 7 or more apricot seeds per day will make it impossible to develop cancer in one’s life time. One or two of the B17 vitamin tablets (100 mg) is an acceptable supplemental dosage per day.
Stores do not sell “raw” apricot seeds because of the raids the FDA made on those stores with B17 vitamin and the apricot seeds years ago. In nearly all cases when the B17 vitamin is taken in high doses the tumors shrink. Now one is faced with the confusion of staying on the chemotherapy or stopping the chemo, due to the unclearness of what shrunk the cancer. Those that continue on with the chemotherapy have a relatively poor outcome.
To Read B 17 Vitamin Analysis…………. Click Here We understand that once an individual is caught in the vacuum cycle of chemotherapy, radiation and operations, it is very difficult to pull away from this higher authority (principalities, prestigious doctors and hospitals) and say “NO” to more chemotherapy.
My friend Jason still has a small tumor in his kidney and would not let Dr. Nagler of Beth Israel Hospital remove his kidney despite his certified “scare” letters sent to his house over and over again. Hundreds of people make the wrong decisions because they were expecting their tumor to disappear. This is one of the things you have to know.
When it shrinks down that’s it, start rejoicing and continue on your natural regimen. Do not stop eating the seeds!!!. The tumor doesn’t disappear. Most doctors will still see a tumor and continue to give a person chemotherapy (until they’re dead) in attempts to make it disappear. Malignant (cancerous) tumors are only a small percentage of the cancer. When the cancer part starts dying off, the tumor only shrinks down the percent that the tumor was cancerous.
In other words
If a kidney tumor is 10 percent cancerous the tumor will shrink down only 10 percent. So if you get a CAT scan, which one should never get (with 6 CAT scans there is over 60% more of a chance of one developing Leukemia; MRI’s are much safer as they use magnetic imaging and not radiation) a 10 percent shrinkage will be concluded as “NO CHANGE” by a doctor. If you have cancer and would like some information on how to take the B17 vitamin as well as foods to eat and foods that you should not eat, keep reading. Here are some helpful tips on improving your health and preventing cancer along with using the B17 vitamin.
Let your body get used to the new changes and start everything at a low dosage and gradually build up or you may get sick.
If you do not have cancer and you want to prevent it, eat 7 to 10 apricots seeds daily (start out at a low dosage, such as 1 or 2 at a time and work up to 7 to 10), stay away from refined sugar (sugar feeds cancer), caffeine (very bad for your liver and kidneys), and white flour (easily changed to sugars).
Read your food labels and educate yourself on ingredients that are listed. Try to eat more raw foods and stay away from the processed food. If it has a warning label on it, you know what to do, right?
If you have cancer now, after finishing this page please read the link on the left labeled “Protocol”. I have reworded the info here as a short version of what is there.
At least 21 days of the injectable B17 vitamin at 9 grams per day plus up to 6 seeds per hour. Start the seeds at a low dosage (such as 1 or 2 at a time) as they must go through your digestive tract and can cause nausea. The injectable needs to be put into a vein.
Up to eighteen 500 MG tablets per day of B17 vitamin and up to 6 seeds per hour for the seeds and/or tablets (start out with a low dosage and build up).
Your digestive system must have time to accommodate the dosage. Plus there is a pancreatic enzyme that helps breaks down the protein wall around a cancer cell. You can get this enzyme by eating raw organic pineapple or you can order a product called “Megazyme Forte” from the same place you got the seeds. Eat just a helping or so of pineapple per day with the seeds.
Start taking a low dosage of vitamin C every day (about 500 to 1000 MG) and slowly build your way up to 10,000 to 25,000 MG per day. This will take some time to get your body used to such levels so don’t be too anxious about getting to the higher dosages right away.
Some symptoms of too high a dose could be:
This does not mean that the product is not working. On the contrary, it means that your body is being detoxified too fast so you need to back off on the dosage. You want to detoxify your body at a slow rate so you won’t get the symptoms described above.
Regardless if you have already torn down you immune system with chemo or radiation, you will want to build it up as much as you can. One way to do this is with a product called AHCC. AHCC will help build your immune system up to the level that is needed to fight cancer and other diseases.
Drink a lot of pure water,microwater is the best
Juicing is good for your liver. You can get some beets and juice them with other vegetables. It is very important that you start slow on this as it could make you feel sick at first. Drink a small amount at first (such as 1/4 cup) and slowly build up to higher amounts. The beet juice will cause your liver to dump toxins into your system as it is a very good liver cleanse. A lot ( about 8 to 10 eight ounce glasses of water per day) of pure micro water will help you rinse the toxins out. Foods you should NOT eat:
Refined sugar (sugar feeds cancer: use Stevia instead), caffeine (very bad for your liver and kidneys), white flour (easily changed to sugars), and try to eat very little meat during this time. You can have meat but meat takes away from the digestive enzymes that help tear down the protein wall that is around the cancer cell.
As for anything new that you do or take,such as B17 vitamin: always start out at a low dosage and build your way up. That way you can monitor what your body is telling you. Now if you feel sick when you start doing any of these things that you have never done,like taking B17 vitamin, it does not mean it is not working. It may be that you are taking too much too fast. Some natural products will detoxify your system and if you do it too fast, it can make you feel sick, (flu like symptoms). Just reduce the dosages of the B17 vitamin you are doing for awhile and slowly increase from that point.
Informations from: All Natural Scientific Cancer Information
Apricot Kernels, Cyanogenic Glycosides, and Cyanide Toxicity
There is a great deal of controversy over the treatment of cancer using supplements containing Vitamin B17 (laetrile). Most commonly this is taken in the form of apricot kernels. Doctors, particularly in the US, say that apricot kernels and other foods containing B17 are full of cyanide, and will prove fatal if eaten. Meanwhile, there is a 30 year history of the successful treatment of cancer using laetrile. These B17 containing foods do contain substances called Cyanogenic Glycosides, but how dangerous are they?
Looking through the literally hundreds of personal stories posted on the internet of people taking B17 and recovering from cancer, it is a common thread that they all say their doctor told them apricot kernels were toxic. And then couldn’t believe it when they got better.
For typical examples see – http://credence.org/testimon.html
Cyanogenic Glycosides are also known as dietary cyanide, so it is technically true that an apricot kernel or apple pips have “cyanide” in them. Or at least they will produce a type of cyanide once ingested. But this is a different form of cyanide to the industrial cyanides typically thought of as cyanide (see an article on Cyanide Toxicity ). And despite having a billion dollar cancer industry to protect, medical research showing actual cases of toxicity caused by eating Cyanogenic Glycosides in foodstuffs are in fact thin on the ground. While it’s a very widely espoused theory that people are dying like flies from eating this stuff, there is a glaringly obvious lack of case studies to back these claims up.
Cyanogenic Glycosides seem to occur in a surprising number of foods known for their healing properties. These include flax seeds, apricot kernels, apple pips, almonds, peach kernels, some types of beans, and in fact over 2500 plant species.
Note that this is only one of a number of “alternative”cancer treatments that have shown good results. This article from DietNet covers a range non-toxic approaches to healing cancer.
However, there are a few honest researchers with integrity who have not played the political cancer game. Money is not what motivates these people but the search for truth does.
Here are their names with a brief synopsis of
their experiments with Laetrile:
Dr. Ernest T. Krebs, Jr.: a biochemist and the researcher who first isolated Laetrile in apricot seeds and also discovered B-15illnesses related to circulation). (pangamic acid, a vitamin which has been proven to be an important adjunctive therapy in the treatment of
He spent three years of anatomy and medicine at Hahnemann Medical College and then changed his direction and became a doctor of biochemistry. He did undergraduate work at the University of Illinois between 1938-41. He did graduate work at the University of Mississippi and also at the University of California.
By 1950, he had isolated the nutritional factor in crystalline form and named it Laetrile. He tested it on animals to make sure that it was not toxic. He then had to prove that it was not toxic to humans. There was only one thing to do. He rolled up his sleeve and injected Laetrile into his own arm. As he predicted, there were no harmful or distressing side effects.
I find it interesting to note that Dr. Krebs was more than willing to test his theory about Laetrile on himself while cancer doctorscancer victims, I mean patients. and their personnel take great precautions to be sure they themselves are not exposed to the drugs they administer to their
Dr. Krebs authored many scientific papers in his lifetime. He was the recipient of numerous honors and doctorates both at home and abroad. He was the science director of the John Beard Memorial Foundation before his death in 1996.
Dr. Dean Burk, Director of the Cytochemistry Section of the federal government’s National Cancer Institute reported that, in a series of tests on animal tissue, the (Laetrile) vitamin B-17 had no harmful effect on normal cells, but was deadly to a cancer cell.
In another series of tests, Dr. Burk reported that Laetrile was responsible for prolonging the life of cancerous rats eighty percent longer than those in the control group that were not inoculated.
Dr. Burk: was one of the foremost cancer specialists in the world. He was the recipient of the Gerhard Domagk Award for Cancer Research, the Hillebrand Award of the American Chemical Society, and the Commander Knighthood Of the Medical Order of Bethlehem (Rome) founded in 1459 by Pope Pius the Eleventh. He held a Ph.D. in biochemistry earned at the University of California.
He was a Fellow of the National Research Council at the University of London, of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Biology, and also Harvard. He was senior chemist at the National Cancer Institute, which he helped establish, and in 1946 became Director of the Cytochemistry Section.
He belonged to eleven scientific organizations, wrote three books relating to chemotherapy research in cancer, and was author or co-author of more than two-hundred scientific papers in the field of cell chemistry. He is a biochemist. If Dr. Burk says that Laetrile works, I believe him!
Dr. Kanematsu Sugiura: for five years, between 1972 and 1977, Laetrile was meticulously tested at Sloan-Kettering under his direction.
Dr. Sugiura was the senior laboratory researcher at Sloan-Kettering with over 60 years experience. He had earned the highest respect for his knowledge and integrity. He was the perfect person to conduct experiments since his quest for truth blocked out anything else.
Dr. C. Chester Stock, the man in charge of Sloan-Kettering’s laboratory-testing division wrote this about Dr. Sigiura, “Few, if any, names in cancer research are as widely known as Kanematsu Sugiura’s… Possibly the high regard in which his work is held is best characterized by a comment made to me by a visiting investigator in cancer research from Russia”.
He said, “When Dr. Sugiura publishes, we know we don’t have to repeat the study, for we would obtain the same results he has reported.” (Ralph Moss, The Cancer Syndrome, New York: Grove Press, 1980 pg. 258)
The official report about Laetrile
from Dr. Sigiura read:
“The results clearly show that Amygdalin significantly inhibits the appearance of lung metastasis in mice bearing spontaneous mammary tumors and increases significantly the inhibition of the growth of the primary tumors… Laetrile also seemed to prevent slightly the appearance of new tumors… The improvement of health and appearance of the treated animals in comparison to controls is always a common observation… Dr. Sugiura has never observed complete regression of these tumors in all his cosmic experience with other chemotherapeautic agents.” (”A Summary of the Effect of Amygdalin Upon Spontaneous Mammary Tumors in Mice,” Sloan-Kettering report, June 13, 1973.)
Dr. Sugiura’s report was cause for great alarm at Sloan-Kettering. Remember, cancer is over a billion dollars a year industry. This report would cause the house of cards to collapse. As would be expected then, many more experiments were conducted by others who were not as honest as Dr. Sugiura.
At a press conference, Dr. Sugiura was asked suddenly by a reporter if he stuck to his report. Dr. Sugiura clearly and boldly stated, “I stick,” even though Sloan-Kettering was trying to discredit everything that he did. To read about the many times that Sloan-Kettering tried to discredit their finest researcher, get the book, “World Without Cancer,” by G. Edward Griffin.
Now, even though we have proof from the laboratories, let us look at what is being discovered in prominent physicians’ studies:
The following is taken from the book, “World Without Cancer”, by G. Edward Griffin, published by American Media, Westlake Village, CA
As early as 1974, there was at least twenty-six published papers written by well-known physicians who had used Laetrile in the treatment of their own patients and who have concluded that Laetrile is both safe and effective in the treatment of cancer.
Dr. Hans Nieper, of West Germany, former Director of the Department of Medicine at the Silbersee Hospital in Hanover. He is a pioneer in the medical use of cobalt and is credited with developing the anti-cancer drug, cyclophosphamide. He is the originator of the concept of “electrolyte carriers” in the prevention of cardiac necrosis.
He was formerly the head of the Aschaffenburg Hospital Laboratory for chemical circulatory research. He is listed in Who’s Who in World Science and has been the Director of the German Society for Medical Tumor Treatment. He is one of the world’s most famous and respected cancer specialists.
During a visit to the U.S. in 1972, Dr. Nieper told news reporters, “After more than twenty years of such specialized work, I have found the nontoxic Nitrilosides-that is Laetrile-far superior to any other known cancer treatment or preventative. In my opinion, it is the only existing possibility for the ultimate control of cancer.”
N.R. Bouziane, M.D.: In Canada there is N.R. Bouziane, M.D., former Director of Research Laboratories at St. Jeanne d’Arc Hospital in Montreal and a member of the hospital’s tumor board in charge of chemotherapy. He graduated magna cum laude in medicine from the University of Montreal. He also received a doctorate in science from the University of Montreal and St. Joseph’s University, an affiliate of Oxford University in New Brunswick. He was a Fellow in chemistry and a Fellow in hematology, and certified in clinical bacteriology, hematology and biochemistry from the college. He also was Dean of the American Association of Bio?Analysts.
After the first series of tests with Laetrile shortly after it was introduced, Dr. Bouziane reported:
“We always have a diagnosis based on histology [microscopic analysis of the tissue]. We have never undertaken a case without histological proof of cancer…
In our investigation, some terminal cases were so hopeless that they did not even receive what we consider the basic dose of thirty grams. Most cases, however, became ambulatory and some have in this short time resumed their normal activities on a maintenance dose.” (Cancer News Journal, Jan./Apr. 1971, pg. 20)
Manuel Navarro, M.D.: In the Philippines there is Manuel Navarro, M.D., former Professor of Medicine and Surgery at the University of Santo Tomas in Manila; an Associate Member of the National Research Council of the Philippines; a Fellow of the Philippine College of Physicians, the Philippine Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism; and a member of the Philippine Medical Association, the Philippine Cancer Society, and many other medical groups. He has been recognized internationally as a cancer researcher and has over one?hundred major scientific papers to his credit, some of which have been read before the International Cancer Congress.
In 1971 Dr. Navarro wrote:
I … have specialized in oncology [the study of tumors] for the past eighteen years. For the same number of years I have been using Laetrile?amygdalin in the treatment of my cancer patients. During this eighteen year period I have treated a total of over five hundred patients with Laetrile & amygdalin by various routes of administration, including the oral and the I.V. The majority of my patients receiving Laetrile?amygdalin have been in a terminal state when treatment with this material commenced.
It is my carefully considered clinical judgment, as a practicing oncologist and researcher in this field, that I have obtained most significant and encouraging results with the use of Laetrile & amygdalin in the treatment of terminal cancer patients, and that these results are comparable or superior to the results I have obtained with the use of the more toxic standard cytotoxic agents. (Letter from Dr. Navarro to Mr. Andrew McNaughton, The McNaughton Foundation, dated January 8, 1971, published in the Cancer News Journal, Jan./April, 1971, pp. 19,20.)
Ernesto Contreras, M.D.: In Mexico there is Ernesto Contreras, M.D., who, for over three decades, has operated the Good Samaritan Cancer Clinic (now called the Oasis Hospital) in Tijuana. He is one of Mexico’s most distinguished medical figures. He received postgraduate training at Harvard’s Children’s Hospital in Boston. He has served as Professor of Histology and Pathology at the Mexican Army Medical School and as the chief pathologist at the Army Hospital in Mexico City.
Dr. Contreras was introduced to Laetrile in 1963 by a terminal cancer patient from the United States who brought it to his attention and urged him to treat her with it. The woman recovered, and Dr. Contreras began extensive investigation of its properties and use. Since that time he has treated many thousands of cancer patients, most of whom are American citizens who have been denied the freedom to use Laetrile in their own country.
Dr. Contreras has summarized his experiences with vitamin
therapy as follows:
The palliative action [improving the comfort and well being of the patient] is in about 60% of the cases. Frequently, enough to be significant, I see arrest of the disease or even regression in some of the very advanced cases.
(Cancer News Journal, Jan./April, 1971, pp. 20. We must bear in mind that these are terminal patients-people who have been given up as hopeless by orthodox medicine. Fifteen percent recovery in that group is a most impressive accomplishment.)
Shigeaki Sakai: In Japan there is Shigeaki Sakai, a prominent physician in Tokyo. In a paper published in the October 1963 Asian Medical journal, Dr. Sakai reported:
Administered to cancer patients, Laetrile has proven to be quite free from any harmful side effects, and I would say that no anti-cancer drug could make a cancerous patient improve faster than Laetrile. It goes without saying that Laetrile controls cancer and is quite effective wherever it is located.
Etore Guidetti, M.D.: In Italy there is Professor Etore Guidetti, M.D., of the University of Turin Medical School. Dr. Guidetti spoke before the Conference of the International Union Against Cancer held in Brazil in 1954
He revealed how his use of Laetrile in terminal cancer patients
had caused the destruction of a wide variety
of tumors including those of:
“In some cases,” he said, “one has been able to observe a group of fulminating and cauliflower like neoplastic masses resolved very rapidly.” He reported that, after giving Laetrile to patients with lung cancer, he had been “able to observe, with the aid of radiography, a regression of the neoplasm or the metastases.”
After Guidetti’s presentation, an American doctor rose in the audience and announced that Laetrile had been investigated in the United States and found to be worthless.
Dr.Guidetti replied, “I do not care what was determined in the United States. I am merely reporting what I saw in my own clinic.” (Cancer News Journal, Jan./April, 1971, p. 19)
Joseph H. Maisin: In Belgium there is Professor Joseph H. Maisin, Sr., M.D., of the University of Louvain where he was Director of the Institute of Cancer. He also was President Emeritus of the International League Against Cancer which conducts the International Cancer Congress every four years.
And in the United States there are such respected names as:
Dr. Dean Burk of the National Cancer Institute.
Dr. John A. Morrone of the Jersey City Medical Center.
Dr. Ernst T. Krebs, Jr., who developed Laetrile.
Dr. John A. Richardson, the courageous San Francisco physician who challenged the government’s right to prevent Laetrile from being used in the United States;
John A. Richardson, M.D., and Patricia Griffin, R.N., Laetrile Case Histories; The Richardson Cancer Clinic Experience published by Westlake Village, CA: American Media, 1977.
Dr. Philip E. Binzel, Jr., a physician in Washington Court House, Ohio, who has used Laetrile for over twenty years with outstanding success (Philip E. Binzel, M.D., Alive and Well: One Doctor’s Experience with Nutrition in the Treatment of Cancer Patients, published by American Media, Westlake Village, CA, 1994) and many others from over twenty countries with equally impeccable credentials.”
In my opinion, these results are more credible than something that can be worked up in a laboratory. The proof of whether Laetrile works or not is undisputed by eyewitness accounts from these highly respected physicians who have had many years of seeing people recover from their cancer by using Laetrile therapy.
Remember, laboratory experiments can be manipulated to produce any result that the researcher is looking for. Unscrupulous men have used these reports for their own gain and benefit, not for the cancer patients.
Laetrile is a vitamin that cannot be patented. It is not worthy to be used in cancer treatment since it is not making the conglomorate pharmaceutical companies, research centers, etc. any money. To them, the only solution is drugs, even though they know without any doubt that these drugs do not work.
To prove it, let’s take a look at what surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy really do to the cancer patient.
Surgery is the least harmful of the three:
Surgery can be life-saving if there are intestinal blockages that must be relieved to prevent death of secondary complications. There is also the psychological advantage of visually removing the tumor and offering the temporary comfort of hope.
However, the degree to which surgery is useful is the same degree to which the tumor is not malignant. The greater the proportion of cancer cells in the tumor, the less likely that surgery will help. The most malignant tumors are generally considered inoperable. There is also to consider what cutting into the tumor, even for a biopsy, does.
First, there is trauma to the area. This triggers the healing process, which in turn, brings more trophoblast cells (the start of cancer) into being as a by-product of that process. (See chapter IV of the book, “World Without Cancer”, by G. Edward Griffin, for more information on the trophoblast thesis of cancer.)
The second thing is that if not all the malignant tissue is removed, what remains may become encased in scar tissue from the surgery. Consequently, the cancer tends to become insulated from the action of the pancreatic enzymes which are essential for exposing trophoblast cells to the surveillant action of the white blood cells.
There is also no solid evidence that patients who submit to surgery have any greater life expectancy, on the average, than those who do not.
For more information regarding the many studies that have been done regarding surgery, see the book, “World Without Cancer”, by G. Edward Griffin.
The rationale behind X-ray therapy is the same as with surgery:
The objective is to remove the tumor, but to do so by burning it away rather than cutting it out. Here, also, it is primarily the non-cancer cell that is destroyed. The more malignant the tumor, the more resistant it is to radio therapy. If this were not so, then X-ray therapy would have a high degree of success-which, of course, it does not.
It also increases the likelihood of cancer developing in other parts of the body.
X-rays induce cancer because of
at least two factors.
First, they do physical damage to the body whichs triggers the production of trophoblast cells as part of the healing process.
Second , they weaken or destroy the production of white blood cells which constitutes the immunological defense mechanism, the body’s front-line defense against cancer.
As with surgery, there is little or no solid evidence that radiation actually improves the patient’s chances for survival.
For more information regarding the many studies that have been done regarding radiation therapy, see the book, “World Without Cancer”, by G. Edward Griffin.
We have now briefly viewed the miserable results obtained by orthodox surgery and radiation. However, the record of so-called anti-cancer drugs is even worse.
The primary reason for this is that most of them currently in use are highly poisonous, not just to cancer but to the rest of the body as well. Generally, they are more deadly to healthy tissue than they are to the malignant cell.
All substances can be toxic if taken in sufficient amounts. This is true of aspirin, sugar, Laetrile or even water. But, unlike those, the anti-cancer drugs are poisonous, not as a result of an overdose or as a side-effect, but as a primary effect.
In other words, anti-cancerous drugs are deliberately poisonous. It is the desired effect. Now, these chemicals are selected because they are capable of differentiating between types of cells and, consequently, of poisoning some types more than others.
But don’t jump to the conclusion that they differentiate between cancer and non-cancer cells, killing only the cancer cells, because they do not. The cellular poisons used in orthodox cancer therapy today cannot distinguish between cancer and non-cancer cells.
They act instead to differentiate between cells that are fast-growing and those that are slow-growing or not growing at all. Cells that are actively dividing are the targets.
Consequently, they kill, not only the cancer cells that are dividing, but also a multitude of normal cells all over the body that also are caught in the act of dividing. In the case of a cancer that is dividing at the same rate or even slower than normal cells, there isn’t even a theoretical chance of success in killing the cancer cells before the poison kills the patient.
Poisoning the system is the objective of these drugs. The toxins catch the blood cells in the act of dividing and cause blood poisoning.
The gastrointestinal systsem is thrown into convulsion causing:
Loss of appetite
Other effects on the body:
Hair cells: are fast growing, so the hair falls out during treatment.
Reproductive organs: are affected causing sterility.
The brain: becomes fatigued.
Eyesight and hearing: are impaired.
Every conceivable function is disrupted with such agony for the patient: that many of them elect to die of the cancer rather than to continue treatment.
I have already said elsewhere on this page that the personnel who administer these drugs to cancer patients take great precautions to be sure they themselves are not exposed to them. Because these drugs are so dangerous, the Chemotherapy Handbook lists sixteen OSHA safety procedures for medical personnel who work around these drugs.
The procedure for disposing needles and other equipment used with these drugs is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency under the category of “hazardous waste”.
Yet, these same substances are injected directly into the bloodstream of hapless cancer patients supposedly to cure their cancer!
A report from the Southern Research Institute, dated April 13, 1972, based upon research conducted for the National Cancer Institute, indicated that most of the accepted drugs in the American Cancer Society’s “proven cures” category produced cancer in laboratory animals that previously had been healthy! Can you believe it?
These drugs are carcinogenic! How can poison and hazardous waste products cure anyone of anything?!!!!
So why do doctors use chemotherapy if it is toxic, an immunosuppressant, carcinogenic, and futile?
The answer is that they don’t know what else to do. Doctors do not like to tell any patient that there is no hope. In his own mind he knows there is none, but he also knows that the patient does not want to hear that and will seek another physician who will continue some kind of treatment, no matter how useless or fatal it may be, so the doctor will continue to treat the patient himself.
In his book The Wayward Cell, Cancer, Dr. Victor Richards made it clear that chemotherapy is used primarily just to keep the patient returning for treatment and to build his morale while he dies. But there is more! He said, “Nevertheless, chemotherapy serves an extremely valuable role in keeping patients oriented toward proper medical therapy, and prevents the feeling of being abandoned by the physician in patients with late and hopeless cancer.
Judicious employment and screening of potentially useful drugs may also prevent the spread of cancer quackery.” (Victor Richards, The Wayward Cell, Cancer; Its Origins, Nature, and Treatment; Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1972, pp. 215-16)
Heaven forbid that anyone should forsake the nauseating, pain-racking, cancer-spreading, admittedly ineffective “proven cures” “quackery” as Laetrile! for such
Here we have revealed, the true goal of much of the so-called “educational” programs of orthodox medicine-psychologically to condition people to not try any other forms of therapy.
So let’s sum up the four different options of dealing with cancer:
SURGERY: Least harmful. Sometimes a life-saving, stop-gap measure. No evidence that patients who receive radical or extensive surgical options live any longer than those who receive the most conservative options, or, for that matter, those who receive none at all. Believed to increase the likelihood of disseminating cancer to other locations. When dealing with internal tumors affecting reproductive or vital organs, the statistical rate of long-term survival is, on the average, 10-15%. After metastasis, the statistical chances for long-term survival are close to zero.
RADIOLOGY: Very harmful in many ways. Spreads the cancer and weakens the patient’s resistance to other diseases. Serious and painful side-effects, including heart failure. No evidence that treated patients live any longer, on the average, than those not treated. Statistical rate of long-term survival after metastasis is close to zero.
CHEMOTHERAPY: Also spreads the cancer through weakening of immunological defense mechanism plus general toxicity. Leaves patient susceptible to other diseases and infections, often leading to death from these causes. Extremely serious side-effects. No evidence that treated patients live any longer, on the average, than untreated patients. Statistical rate of long-term survival after metastasis is close to zero.
VITAMIN THERAPY: Non-toxic. Side effects include increased appetite, weight gain, lowered blood pressure, increased hemoglobin and red-blood cell count. Eliminates or sharply reduces pain without narcotics. Builds up body’s resistance to other diseases. Is a natural substance found in foods and is compatible with human biological experience. Destroys cancer cells while nourishing non-cancer cells. Considering that most patients begin vitamin therapy only after they have been cut, burned, or poisoned by orthodox treatments and have been told that there no longer is any hope, the numbe rof patients who have been brought back to normal health on a long-term survival basis (15%) is most encouraging. For those who turn to vitamin therapy first, the long-term survival rate is greater than 80%!
Wow, what a difference Laetrile makes in a person.
It is my opinion that everyone should read the book “World Without Cancer”, by G. Edward Griffin for a clearer understanding of cancer, the way the human body gets it, and the politics that keep vitamin therapy outside the masses grasp.
Even if you do not have cancer, you will benefit from this book. Cancer does not have to be feared anymore, just like we do not fear scurvy, rickets, beri-beri, etc. We have not been left defenseless on this earth but we need to have ears to hear the truth and to apply the truth to our lives for life.
No human being loves you better than you do. No doctor, researcher, politician, etc. Only Yahweh loves you more. He has provided this information so we will be able to live whole and fruitful lives, not enslaved to the political sources behind the scenes.
Study for yourself what is truth and the truth will set you free!